Creator insurance.
We've got your back.

Someone sues you over your content? Creator Insurance helps pay for your defense. Someone steals your work or lies about you? Our Fight Back coverage pays for legal action against them.

Group posing outside a courthouse with a CreatorSure sign

Who it's for

If you make content for a living, this is for you.

Big audience or just getting going. Full-time or side hustle.

More creator types

Creator Insurance

Most insurance only shows up when you get sued.
Creator Insurance also helps you fight back.

It's built around media liability, the coverage for what you say, show and post. Then it goes a step further, because for most creators, getting ripped off is just as real a risk as getting sued.

Half one

When someone comes after you

You made a video. Someone didn't like it. Now there's a letter from a lawyer. This half helps cover it.

  • A brand or a person sues you over a video you posted
  • Someone says your commentary or review defamed them
  • A copyright claim over music, clips or images in your content
  • A privacy claim from someone you filmed
  • A sponsor says you broke a disclosure rule or your contract
  • Lawyer fees and legal defense costs while you deal with it
Half two

When someone wrongs you, fight back

Your work is your income. When someone takes it, fakes you, or trashes your name, this half helps you go after them.

  • Someone reuploads or steals your videos
  • Copycat accounts and impersonators using your name or face (or even AI Deepfakes)
  • Someone spreads lies about you that cost you brand deals
  • A brand keeps using your content after the deal ends, without paying
  • Helps pay for a lawyer to pursue them, send takedowns and demand letters

Even the U.S. Copyright Office has said it: "Copyright owners whose works are infringed often are deterred from enforcing their rights due to the burden and expense of pursuing litigation in the federal system." Copyright Small Claims report, 2013

Think your commercial liability policy covers this? It probably doesn't. See why

What this looks like in real life

A few things that actually happen.

Someone comes after you

A drama channel gets a cease-and-desist over a video.

A creator you covered says your video is defamatory and threatens to sue. Your policy helps pay for a lawyer to respond and defend you if it goes further.

You fight back

Your viral clip gets reuploaded by a page with 2M followers.

They cropped out your watermark and are farming views off it. Creator Insurance helps pay for a lawyer to send takedowns and a demand letter.

Someone comes after you

A song in the background of your vlog triggers a copyright claim.

The label goes beyond a strike and asks for money. Your policy handles the legal side of sorting it out.

You fight back

A brand is still running your ad six months after the deal ended.

Your contract said 90 days. They never paid for more. Creator Insurance helps you hire a lawyer to go after what you're owed.

Someone comes after you

Someone in your street interview video sues you for invading their privacy.

You filmed in public and posted it. The clip blew up, strangers started recognizing them, and now they say you used their face without consent and made them look bad. Your policy helps pay for a lawyer to defend you.

You fight back

A fake account is DMing your fans pretending to be you.

It's asking for money in your name. You can get help with takedowns and, if needed, legal action against whoever is behind it.

Worried about AI or deepfakes of you? See AI deepfake insurance.

Real cases

It can't happen to me
Tell that to these creators.

These are real court cases involving YouTubers, streamers, reviewers and other creators. Some got sued over what they posted. Others went after people who took their work.

Someone came after them
Tom BradySteph CurryShaquille O'NealLarry David

Paid to promote FTX. Sued when it collapsed.

Tom Brady, Steph Curry, Shaquille O'Neal, Larry David, finance YouTubers and other paid promoters, sued by FTX customers

Someone came after them
KJBilly Mitchell

A gaming YouTuber lost a defamation case over one video.

Karl Jobst, gaming YouTuber, sued by Donkey Kong champion Billy Mitchell

Someone came after them
Ethan KleinHKMH

h3h3 got sued over a reaction video.

Ethan and Hila Klein (h3h3productions), sued by YouTuber Matt Hosseinzadeh

More real cases 42 more

Sued over what they said or filmed 19

Someone came after them
RU

A true-crime YouTuber said a teen's death was a hoax.

Ryan Upchurch, true-crime YouTuber, sued by the family of Kiely Rodni

He used his channel to claim the 16-year-old's 2022 death was a hoax and that her family was running a donation scam. The family sued him for defamation.

$17.5M jury verdict$11M to her grandfather and $6.5M to her father. Upchurch is fighting the verdict.

Rodni / Robertson v. Upchurch · Tennessee state court · May 2026

Source: Law.com / The Recorder

Someone came after them
Tasha KCardi B

A gossip vlogger posted false claims about Cardi B.

Latasha Kebe ("Tasha K"), vlogger, sued by Cardi B

Her vlog, unWinewithTashaK, published at least 38 false statements, including claims that Cardi B was a prostitute, had herpes and used cocaine.

$4M+ total$1.25M in general damages and $1.5M in punitive damages, plus $1,338,753.47 of Cardi B's legal fees. Kebe later filed for bankruptcy.

Almanzar v. Kebe · N.D. Georgia · Jury verdict Jan 2022, affirmed on appeal Mar 2023

Sources: Mondaq · Stereogum

Someone came after them
COMHDr. O.H. "Bud" Frazier

A surgeon sued reporters over a story. Insurance paid most of the defense.

ProPublica, the Houston Chronicle and reporters Charles Ornstein and Mike Hixenbaugh, sued by heart surgeon Dr. O.H. "Bud" Frazier

Frazier sued for defamation in 2018 over an investigation into his work. Trial judges twice refused to throw the case out, and it took two appeals before a Texas appeals court ordered it dismissed in April 2024, finding the reporting substantially true or opinion. Ornstein wrote that the case cost him sleep and a mortgage lender.

Insurance paid most of the billFrazier paid part of their legal fees in a confidential settlement, but ProPublica says its insurer covered the vast majority of the cost after it met its deductible. Its insurance rates went up sharply afterward.

Frazier v. ProPublica · Texas First Court of Appeals · Filed 2018, dismissal ordered Apr 2024

Sources: ProPublica (Ornstein) · ProPublica · Court opinion (Justia) · Haynes Boone

  • Joiner v. Callaghan / Channel 5 (2024, 2026). A lender sued YouTube documentarian Andrew Callaghan over the documentary "Dear Kelly." The first suit was dismissed; a second, adding defamation and privacy claims, is pending. Defense costs passed $800,000. Dexerto · Complaint (ABA Journal)
  • Collinson v. McBroom (2024). A woman says family vlogger Austin McBroom (ACE Family) entered her home without consent to film Snapchat skits and posted videos showing her address, after which strangers showed up. A restraining order was granted; the case is pending. Dexerto
  • I Buy Beauty v. Dong (Canada, 2024). A YouTuber spent about a year posting videos and posts accusing a beauty marketing company and its CEO of stealing customer credit card information, money laundering and fraud, with no evidence. He was held liable for defamation: $350,000 in damages plus a permanent injunction. McMillan LLP
  • Armstrong v. Mengshoel (2022). Crypto YouTuber Atozy (Erling Mengshoel Jr.) posted a video saying Ben Armstrong ("BitBoy Crypto") dishonestly promoted dubious assets. BitBoy sued him for defamation and asked for $75,000. Atozy crowdfunded more than $200,000 for his defense in under 24 hours, and the suit was dropped within weeks. CoinTelegraph
  • Kavanaugh v. Klein (2025). Film producer Ryan Kavanaugh sued podcaster Ethan Klein for defamation over "Ponzi scheme" accusations. Klein's anti-SLAPP motion was denied, and the denial was upheld on appeal. Federal filing
  • Jakes v. Youngblood (2024). Pastor T.D. Jakes sued pastor Duane Youngblood over allegations made in YouTube podcast interviews. Youngblood's anti-SLAPP motion was denied, and Jakes dropped the case in October 2025. Faith on View · Religion News Service
  • Gharavi v. Schwab (2025). A youth-wrestling YouTuber sued a sports photographer over X posts warning parents about his videos. Dismissed: the posts didn't identify him and were protected opinion. PetaPixel
  • Auto Junction v. Kaluzhin (Arizona, 2022). A car dealership sued a Russian-language YouTube reviewer over his review video and online reviews, and sought a court order to stop him from posting them. Reason / Volokh
  • Cantu v. Kim Kardashian (2025). Ivan Cantu sued, saying his image was mistakenly used in commentary about a death-row inmate with the same name. His claims were dismissed on her anti-SLAPP motion, and he was ordered to pay $167,475 of her attorneys' fees. DIYPhotography
  • Sandher Fruit Packers v. MacAskill (Canada, 2025). A blogger accused a fruit-packing family of cartel and terrorist ties. The court entered a default judgment in December 2025, and an arrest warrant was issued for contempt. NewsBeep · Judgment (Canadian Lawyer)
  • Peros v. Nationwide News (Australia, 2024). A defamation suit over the true-crime podcast "Shandee's Story" was dismissed for failing the "serious harm" test. Court judgment
  • Barilaro v. Shanks / Google (Australia, 2021 to 2022). A politician sued YouTuber Jordan Shanks (friendlyjordies). Shanks settled with an apology and a $100,000 costs contribution, with no damages. Google was separately ordered to pay $715,000 as publisher of the videos. Wikipedia · Rose Litigation
  • Hijazi v. Yaxley-Lennon (UK, 2021). Activist "Tommy Robinson" posted Facebook videos falsely claiming a schoolboy attacked schoolgirls. The court awarded £100,000 plus an injunction; breaching it later led to 18 months for contempt. Hello Rayo · The Global Post
  • Jawort v. Hall (Montana, 2021). An activist sued pastor-blogger JD Hall over a story he made up. Hall admitted it was fabricated, published a retraction and apology, and a $250,000 claim was allowed against his bankruptcy. Religion News Service
  • Digital Homicide v. Stanton (2016). A game developer sued critic Jim Sterling over negative reviews, eventually seeking $15M. Dismissed with prejudice in 2017; the developer recovered $0. Kotaku · GameSpot
  • Taiwan restaurant v. food blogger (2011). A restaurant sued a blogger whose review called the food "too salty" and alleged cockroaches in the kitchen. The court ordered a suspended 30-day detention, two years' probation and NT$200,000 (about $6,928) in compensation. Stanford CIS

Copyright and trademark fights 10

  • Klein v. Denims (2026). Ethan Klein sued Twitch streamer Denims over her livestreamed reaction to his documentary. Dismissed as fair use; Klein announced an appeal. Law360
  • Tekniq v. Elite Vehicles (2026). One automotive YouTube channel sued another for copyright infringement and allegedly fraudulent DMCA counter-notices. Pending; reported by a single source so far. JD Supra
  • Epoch v. von Engelbrechten (2025). The Calico Critters toymaker sued the "Sylvanian Drama" TikTok creator over her toy parody videos, claiming copyright and trademark infringement and seeking up to $150,000 per work. Settled confidentially around August 2025. Marketing Brew · AV Club
  • AGATHA v. Hengyu Company (China, 2021). A livestream seller sold handbags bearing AGATHA's trademarks on a Douyin (TikTok) livestream. The brand won RMB 300,000 (about $46,550). Chambers & Partners
  • Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games (2016 to 2020). A tattoo-licensing company sued 2K Games, saying NBA 2K infringed its copyrights in five tattoos on players including LeBron James. 2K won: the use was minimal, covered by an implied license from the players, and fair use. DWW
  • Xposure Photos v. Khloe Kardashian (2017). A photo agency sued after she posted a paparazzi photo of herself to Instagram without licensing it. Settled. The Fashion Law
  • Integral Images / Barbera v. Dua Lipa (2019, 2021). Photographers sued singer Dua Lipa over Instagram posts of paparazzi photos of herself. The first suit was dismissed with prejudice in October 2020; the outcome of the second, filed June 2021, wasn't confirmed in the sources. NME
  • Xclusive-Lee v. Hadid (2019). A paparazzi photographer sued model Gigi Hadid over her Instagram post of a photo of herself. Dismissed because the photographer hadn't registered the copyright before suing. Rangefinder
  • Ultra Records v. Phan (2014). A dance label sued beauty YouTuber Michelle Phan, saying 50 of its tracks were used in her makeup tutorials without licenses. Settled in 2015, terms confidential. Tubefilter
  • Whitmill v. Warner Bros. (2011). A tattoo artist sued over his Mike Tyson tattoo design being copied onto Ed Helms' face in The Hangover Part II. The court said he was likely to win ("of course tattoos can be copyrighted"), and the case settled confidentially. Law.com · Backstage

Brand deals, ads and endorsements 2

  • Lupea v. Gymshark (2026). A class action says Gymshark paid fitness influencers for posts presented as organic, with ad disclosures missing or buried. Pending. A related suit targets ALO Yoga and named influencers. Mondaq · FKKS
  • Social Gloves litigation (2021). Austin McBroom's company sued LiveXLive over an influencer boxing event, and LiveXLive countersued for $100M, including a defamation claim. Settled in December 2021; LiveOne paid $3M to event payees. Sportsweek · Dexerto

Creators who fought back 11

  • Holston v. R5 Brands LLC (W.D. North Carolina, filed Oct 2026). UGC creator Amber Jordan Holston says supplement brand True Nutra ran her face, voice and four of her copyrighted videos, originally made for a different brand, in at least 12 paid Meta ads without a license or her consent. She's suing for copyright infringement, misuse of her likeness, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. Pending. PPC Land
  • Steinarsdottir v. Tripscout (D.C., filed 2023). A travel creator says Tripscout posted her Instagram content to its own accounts at least eight times despite her objections, including twice after she filed suit. At the summary judgment stage as of October 2026. Court filing (CCH)
  • Furie v. InfoWars (C.D. California, settled Jun 2019). Matt Furie, the artist behind Pepe the Frog, sued InfoWars for selling a poster featuring his character. The court rejected InfoWars' fair use defense, and it settled for $15,000. InfoWars had to destroy the remaining posters and never sell Pepe merch again. WilmerHale (Furie's lawyers)
  • Ted Entertainment v. ByteDance (2025). h3h3 Productions and golf creators sued ByteDance, saying it got around YouTube's anti-scraping protections to mass-download their videos to train AI. The motion to dismiss was denied in October 2026. MediaPost · Trademark Lawyer
  • Dua Lipa v. Samsung (2026). She says her photo was printed on Samsung TV packaging without permission and is seeking $15M+. Samsung has moved to dismiss. Pending. Music Business Worldwide
  • Frankel v. TikTok (2022). Bethenny Frankel and a proposed class of creators say TikTok used their content in ads for counterfeit and unlicensed goods without consent. Pending, per their lawyers. Morgan & Morgan
  • Monroe v. Hopkins (UK, 2017). Food blogger Jack Monroe sued columnist Katie Hopkins over two tweets and won £24,000 in damages, with £107,000 in interim costs ordered against Hopkins. Judgment · Pinsent Masons
  • AFP v. Morel (2010 to 2014). Photojournalist Daniel Morel posted photos of the 2010 Haiti earthquake on Twitter. AFP and Getty Images sent eight of them to clients without his permission, at first crediting someone else. AFP sued him first, asking a court to say it hadn't infringed, and he countersued. A jury found the infringement willful and awarded the maximum $1.2 million in statutory damages plus $20,000 under the DMCA, and the judge upheld the $1.22 million total in 2014. Court decision (Justia) · Loeb & Loeb · Willkie (Morel's lawyers)
  • Richardson v. Townsquare Media (2026). Videographer Delray Richardson sued the owner of hip-hop news site XXL after it republished his entire video of Michael Jordan breaking up a fight and used screenshots from his videos in headlines. In April 2026 the Second Circuit revived those claims, saying the full-video use couldn't be called fair use this early and recognizable screenshots weren't too trivial to count. His claim over an embedded YouTube interview stayed dismissed because of YouTube's license terms. The case went back to the trial court. Court opinion (2d Cir.) · Stanford Fair Use Center
  • Cordova v. Huneault (2025). Christopher Cordova, who runs the auditor YouTube channel Denver Metro Audits, sued the operators of another channel, saying they downloaded and reposted parts of his videos and filed false DMCA counter-notices to get them restored. In January 2026 the court let his counter-notice and anti-circumvention claims go forward and dismissed one other claim. Pending; nothing has been decided on the merits. Court order (Justia) · VitalLaw
  • Lenz v. Universal Music (2015). A mom's 29-second YouTube video of her baby dancing to a Prince song got hit with a takedown. The 9th Circuit ruled that copyright holders must consider fair use before sending DMCA takedowns. Snell & Wilmer · Public Knowledge

How it works

  1. 1

    Tell us about you

    Fill out the quote form below. Tell us what you make and where you share it.

  2. 2

    We build your custom quote

    We put together a custom quote built around the coverage you actually want, so you're not paying for things you don't need.

  3. 3

    Pick your coverage

    We walk you through your options in plain English. You decide. No pressure.

Get a quote

Let's get you covered.

Tell us a bit about what you do. A real person reads every request and gets back to you.

What do you want covered?

Sending this doesn't buy a policy or start coverage. It just starts the conversation.

Rather email? hello@creatorsure.co

FAQ

Questions people ask us.

What is Creator Insurance?

It's insurance for what you create. If someone says your work defamed them, used their copyrighted or trademarked work, invaded their privacy, stole their work, or was false advertising, it helps pay for your legal defense.

It's also coverage that helps pay for a lawyer to go after someone who steals or misuses your work. Think someone reposting your videos or photos as their own, using your brand name or trademark, or putting your name or face on something without your permission. Most insurance only shows up to defend you when you get sued. Creator Insurance helps you be the one who takes action.

Do I need this if I'm small?

Lawsuits and stolen content don't wait until you hit a certain follower count. A small creator can get a demand letter just as easily as a big one, and a legal bill can hurt a lot more when you're just starting. It works the other way too. A big brand can take a small creator's video or photo and use it, and unless you can afford a lawyer, there's usually nothing you can do about it. Creator Insurance helps you fight back. If you post regularly, work with brands, or talk about real people, it's worth a conversation.

Does it cover brand deals?

It can. Creator Insurance helps with claims tied to sponsored content, like a sponsor saying you broke a disclosure rule or your contract. People can also sue creators and influencers over products they promoted that ended up hurting them. When the crypto exchange FTX collapsed, customers sued the celebrities who promoted it, including Tom Brady, Shaquille O'Neal, Steph Curry and Larry David (it's one of the real cases above). On the other side, it helps you go after a brand that keeps using your content after the deal without paying. Exact coverage depends on your policy.

Can my manager, agency, or a brand get proof of coverage?

Yes. Once you're covered, we can send a certificate of insurance to anyone who needs proof. That includes managers, talent and influencer marketing agencies, production houses and studios, multi-channel networks (MCNs), brands and sponsors, event organizers and venues, publicists, and business managers. Just tell us who needs it.

How fast can I get a quote?

Fill out the form and a real person will get back to you to talk through what you need. Simple requests can move quickly. Others take a little longer because an underwriter has to review them, and we'll tell you up front what to expect.

What does it cost?

It depends on what you make, where you post, and what coverage you pick. We won't guess at a number here. Ask for a quote and we'll give you a real one.

What if I'm a Musician, Producer, or Record label?

Our sister site, SongSure, is built for musicians, producers, record labels, studios, and venues. Visit songsure.co to get a quote.